The Importance of Modern Management Theories in Managing People by Chuck Robert - Updated September 26, Academics and business owners periodically come up with theories for increasing worker output while keeping the same number of workers through modern management theories. According to political science professor Dr.
Claude Brodeur PhD, http: Change and the phenomenon of it, is fundamental to evolution; and yet it implies some sort of resistance. Resistance to change can take various forms and the task of filtering out the cause of resistance can often be difficult.
Examples include change in work processes where the needs, expectations, and concerns of individuals are ignored. Change and resistance to it forms a knock-on-effect to both the construction and destruction of any organisation.
Fear is one of the major forms of resistance to change and I shall discuss this in depth at a later stage. Alas resistance to change can be categorised to the organisational level and the individual level. It is these two separate levels which I shall discuss further exploring what steps may be taken to overcome resistance at both the organisational and individual level.
The Organisational Barriers to Change There are a number of barriers to change at the organisational level that, need to be addressed to allow change to be implemented with the least amount of resistance. Undefined Goals and Objectives An organisation should clarify continually the goals and objectives, outlining roles and specifying performance standards.
Financial and Environmental Lack of working capital in an organisation can prevent it from introducing change that is necessary to stay ahead of competitors or merely survive as a business. In these circumstances redundancies are almost inevitable.
The lack of finance could be due to a variety of factors. Bad resource allocation, occur when managers make bad decisions in allocating resources such as money, time, machinery and staff.
Managers should use their imagination to avoid causing conflict situations. Structural An organisation that follows the traditional hierarchical structure tends to resist change more than that which has a more flat structure.
Communication between head of departments and employees in traditional hierarchical structures are usually poor which causes a rift between Management and Employees.
Insufficient Communication There are two branches of communication, which are communication internally, within the organisation between Employees and Management and externally between the organisation and suppliers and customers.
In organisations where management keep employees in the dark with respect to change potentially face fierce resistance.
Employees may interpret this as a conspiracy against them inevitably leading to an unfriendly atmosphere to work in. Organisations that fail to communicate with their Customers and Suppliers, changes that are in effect can face disastrous consequences. Unfortunate for Tiptree, which encountered problems with their new systems for about six months; had tarnished its British Book Awards Distributor of the Year.
Bad leaders who merely provide are not doing enough to inspire the employees to march ahead. People want to be shown the way. Lack of Preparation for New Roles Organisations may lack in their planning phase.webkandii.com: A Short History of Renaissance and Reformation Europe (4th Edition) (): Jonathan W.
Zophy: Books. Relations between Aborigines and colonists. Aboriginal War Friends or foes? History Wars Denying contestability. Black Woman and White Man Rape or love?
Academics and business owners periodically come up with theories for increasing worker output while keeping the same number of workers through modern management theories.
According to political science professor Dr. Yasin Olum, modern management is the era of management that began in the s and s with Frederick. Recommended Posts. Alternative to FEGLI Option B.
Recent Posts. Alcoholism and Verbal Abuse; Hyponatremia and Alcoholism. Master Data Management Summit Europe. May Radisson Blu Portman Hotel, London. Conference. Russell's teapot is an analogy, formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (–), to illustrate that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making unfalsifiable claims, rather than shifting the burden of disproof to others..
Russell specifically applied his analogy in the context of religion. He wrote that if he were to .